Conference Sponsors:

CDW-G

CGI-AMS

Cisco

Juniper

Microsoft

Motorola

NIC

Northrop Grumman

SAP

Symantec

Unisys

Verisign


Posted September 1, 2007

Information on Governing conferences

SPECIAL CONFERENCE REPORT
Governing’s Managing Technology 2007

Plus: Main conference report

Lawmakers and the IT Connection


CHICAGO — When Ken Svedjan arrived in the North Dakota House of Representatives in 1991, something was missing: computers. Legislators, whose desks on the floor serve as their offices, didn’t want their scarce space cluttered with desktops and didn’t see the need for them.

Svedjan didn’t pay much attention to technology either, until he noticed that the governor’s budget called for large IT spending increases. He suggested, and received, a committee to a study the issue. “I really didn’t realize how much I didn’t know about technology until I got on that committee,” he says.

Such is the life of the legislator, who is expected to make policy and funding decisions on a multitude of topics, even ones about which he or she knows little. As Svedjan found, states spend a lot on IT, and appropriators, regardless of personal technological interest, exercise power over technology projects.

Good communication is important in building a good executive-legislative relationship on IT issues, legislators at Governing’s Managing Technology conference said. And it helps if the chief information officer is more of a policy officer than a technology guru. Legislators don’t want to be inundated with technical jargon. What they do want to know, said Wisconsin state Senator Ted Kanavas, himself the founder of a software company, is why a project is worthwhile and what they can do to reduce the risk of failure.

Even when legislators have good information, however, that’s no guarantee of prudent decisions. Svedjan noted that often it’s easier to kill a project than to try to understand it. “Our biggest challenge,” he said, “is with the legislators themselves.”

There are signs of progress. In North Dakota, legislators are exercising more effective oversight with the help of an IT advisory committee that provides quarterly status reports on projects. And this year, the final two holdouts decided they needed laptops at their desks.

— Josh Goodman

News from the conference:
Keys to Technology Success: Management, Leadership