Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.
Paul Posner

Paul L. Posner

Contributor

Paul L. Posner, who died July 5, 2017, was director of the public-administration program at George Mason University. He also was a former president of the American Society for Public Administration.

Posner served for many years with the U.S. Government Accountability Office, where he was managing director for federal budget and intergovernmental relations, leading GAO's work on the long-term federal budget outlook and emerging challenges for public-sector finances at all levels of government.

Posner was the author of "The Politics of Unfunded Mandates,", published in 1998, and was the winner of the 2008 Martha Derthick Best Book Award given by the Section on Federalism and Intergovernmental Management of the American Political Science Association. He received his Ph.D. in political science from Columbia University.

An exceptional project from the past illustrates how beneficial measuring public-sector performance can be.
They're inevitable for a host of reasons, and the blame will fall on top elected officials. Can they fix problems before they become full-blown crises?
Our state and local governments vary greatly in their capacity to address urgent public needs. Shouldn't we be talking about this issue?
We need a forum for our state, local and federal governments to collaborate on the fiscal challenges they all face. But in today's fiscal climate, it's hard to see that happening.
Analysis of long-term government commitments such as pensions is important, but overly rigid funding rules are a formula for intergenerational conflict.
Making spending decisions based on evidence and analysis can be hardest to do in times of austerity, but that's precisely when these tools are most useful.
State and local leaders face a severe challenge in dealing with the short-term recession while at the same time planning for future fiscal burdens.
More often than not, the federal government punishes rather than rewards states for innovative solutions to national problems.
The stimulus law's transparency requirements won't shed much light on the achievement of objectives.
The assistance from Washington is full of compromises that undercut its effectiveness. There is a better way.