Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Iowa AG Moves to Strip County of All Funding Over Immigration Post

The sheriff of Winneshiek County has complied with all federal and state immigration enforcement requests, but state Attorney General Brenna Bird said his Facebook post spread false information about the need for court orders.

Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird says the Winneshiek County sheriff violated Iowa law by discouraging law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials. (Jared Strong/Iowa Capital Dispatch)
Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird filed a lawsuit Thursday against Winneshiek County and its sheriff, Dan Marx, for allegedly violating Iowa law by discouraging law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration officials.

The lawsuit, filed in Polk County District Court, claims that Iowa law “requires stripping Winneshiek County of state funding until the sheriff follows the procedure to reinstate the funds” by disavowing his previous public statements on immigration enforcement.

The lawsuit acknowledges that Sheriff Marx “has complied with every Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainer request made of his office since Nov. 26, 2018.”

In a Feb. 4, 2025, Facebook post, Marx, a Republican, stated that if his office received “detainer” requests to hold suspected illegal immigrants, and those requests were not vetted and approved by the courts, they would be rejected by his office.

In his post, Marx distinguished between detainer requests of that kind and what he called “valid” judicial warrants and court orders. He wrote that “the only reason detainers are issued is because the federal agency does not have enough information or has not taken the time to obtain a valid judicial warrant.”

Bird claims that assertion by Marx is false.

Gov. Kim Reynolds, a Republican like Bird, had sent the attorney general’s office an official complaint seeking an investigation into the Facebook post.

In a report summarizing her investigation, Bird alleged Marx’s post violated Iowa Code Chapter 27A, which prohibits state law enforcement from discouraging public cooperation with federal immigration authorities. Bird says Marx’s Facebook post discourages such cooperation by making “false claims” and by threatening to interfere with enforcing Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainers.

According to Bird, Marx has said that his office has complied with all 21 of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainers that it has received. But on Wednesday, she said her office would take action against Marx unless he posted a statement specifically stating that his previous claims were wrong and that he disavowed them.

Bird provided Marx with specific language to include in the public statement, which she said had to conform “substantially” to the language she dictated. The statement was written in the first-person to appear over Marx’s signature.

Although Marx’s office recently deleted the January Facebook post, Marx did not publish the statement prescribed by Bird.

In a press release issued Thursday, Bird’s office said “the attorney general gave the sheriff an opportunity to fix the violation” by 5 p.m. on Wednesday by issuing the statement she provided. “He refused, even though he knows that the violation may result in a loss of state funding for his entire county,” the press release stated.

“Sheriff Marx was given the chance to retract his statement, follow the law, and honor ICE detainers, but he refused — even at a cost to his home county,” Bird stated in the press release. “He left us with no choice but to take the case to court to enforce our laws and ensure cooperation with federal immigration authorities.”

The lawsuit concedes that rather than “defying” ICE, Marx has “enforced federal and state law whenever asked” and has complied with “every single ICE detainer request made.”

Despite this, the lawsuit alleges, Marx “intentionally posted false information” through his Facebook post. “That false information had the effect of discouraging violation enforcement in violation of the law,” the lawsuit claims, adding that there has been “no public walk back, revocation, or other corrective action” taken.

The lawsuit seeks a court order declaring Winneshiek County to be ineligible to receive any state funds. The lawsuit also seeks “all other relief necessary or appropriate to remedy the effects” of the sheriff’s actions.

Marx has yet to file a response to the lawsuit. He could not be reached for comment Thursday.

Clark Kauffman is deputy editor of Iowa Capital Dispatch, which published this article. Read the original here.