That same survey revealed that three out of four CIOs are involved in broadband efforts in their state, but the specifics of their involvement vary considerably. Colorado CIO Tony Neal-Graves, Minnesota CIO Tarek Tomes and Scott Adams, deputy director for broadband and digital literacy in California, joined Tom Curtin of the National Governors Association for a look at where broadband responsibility lies in each state, and where things stand today.
On the job for about a month, California’s Adams reports to state CIO Amy Tong, who leads the California Department of Technology. He “manages the ecosystem” of stakeholders involved in advancing connectivity in the state, which includes a 12-member council established in 2010 and chaired by Tong. The group, charged with promoting broadband in un- and underserved areas of the state, has representation from the Public Utilities Commission, the Department of Education, the Office of Emergency Services, and other agencies. Gov. Gavin Newsom issued an executive order on broadband last August, adding new urgency to connectivity efforts, directing state agencies to expand availability to 100 megabits per second for all Californians.
In Minnesota, broadband efforts are housed within the Department of Employment and Economic Development, Tomes explained, given the inextricable link between access to connectivity and the overall economic health of the state. “[Having] broadband in economic development is ideal because the connection between what happens in the economy and broadband access is so intertwined,” he said. Minnesota IT Services, led by Tomes, does run MNET, Minnesota’s Network for Enterprise Telecommunications, a statewide network that provides connectivity for state agencies, localities, schools and health-care institutions .
Tony Neal-Graves became state CIO last September following several years as executive director of the Colorado Broadband Office. In 2019, they moved towards formalizing the office’s relationships with state agencies. At that point, a public advisory board was established, which includes industry representatives, local officials and directors of state agencies. This kind of broad collaboration was lauded by all three panelists as a critical component to successful broadband efforts.
ACCESS TO CAPITAL
In Minnesota, Tomes described the “border-to-border grant program.” Established in 2013, Tomes said it has supported more than $120 million in broadband development in the state. He also pointed to Minnesota’s broadband task force as important to taking a big-picture look at what funding opportunities will work best for which part of the state.
Colorado has spent almost $106 million over the last five years on grants for middle- and last-mile efforts, Neal-Graves said. New legislation coming out this year will provide an additional $74 million and support not only expanding the infrastructure that gets fiber to homes, but also pivot the state toward solving associated problems, like digital literacy and access to tools like enough computers in a home to maximize what citizens can do with that high-speed connection.
GRANT EXPERTISE
Of course, it doesn’t matter how many grants are available if organizations or governments don’t know how to apply for them. Neal-Graves explained that while they’re starting to see impacts from broadband grants from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and FCC, Colorado realized early on that small providers either didn’t know how to navigate the complex process of applying for federal grants or they didn’t have the resources to do it. To help solve the problem, the state designated a staff member to be their go-to “federal expert,” providing much needed grant application support.
“My mantra was ‘Let’s get our unfair share of the money,’” Neal-Graves said, stressing that you don’t have a shot at winning funding that you never ask for.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
When asked what was the No. 1 best thing his state has done to move the needle on the broadband-for-all directive, Neal-Graves said the most helpful thing he’s found has been getting buy-in from local communities.
“It’s a classic ‘it takes a village,’” he said. “It’s great the federal government is now providing more funds, but if you don’t have the engagement at the local level, it’s incredibly challenging to provide solutions to those communities.”
He explained that Colorado set up a plan to specifically target building that engagement. The state puts up 50 percent of the money and the locality has to match it. The state offers strategy development support, and the state can help the community manage the system, but ownership must reside at the community level. Developing “passion” for the project at the local level will then potentially drive down the cost for ISPs to consider deploying last-mile services, Neal-Graves said.
“There’s not a single state plan,” he said. “There’s a plan based on your community needs and whatever structure you have in place.”
Government Technology is a sister site to Governing. Both are divisions of e.Republic.
