Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Port Strike Reflects Anxieties About Automation in Labor

Longshoremen are striking for better wages, but they also say they're fighting to protect jobs against automation. U.S. ports tend to be less automated than some large ports in other countries.

Strikers at the port terminal in Philadelphia on Oct. 1.
Strikers at the port terminal in Philadelphia on Oct. 1.
Jared Brey
The International Longshoremen’s Association (ILA) declared a strike Tuesday morning, shutting down most work at 36 U.S. ports on the east coast and in the Gulf of Mexico.

Depending on how long it lasts, the strike could disrupt the flow of goods into and out of the U.S., drive up prices and cause other economic impacts that could be consequential during election season. While many shippers and retailers were anticipating the strike, the closure of ports could potentially affect the availability of perishable goods such as fruit. President Joe Biden has the legal authority to end the strike, but has vowed not to use it in the short term. Ports in the western U.S. remain open.

The strike represents another disruption for already strained port supply chains. The COVID-19 pandemic caused shutdowns at global ports and related delays that raised the cost of imports. Shippers moved some business from Pacific coast ports, where delays and disruptions were concentrated in the U.S., to eastern ports during that time. Earlier this year, the collapse of the Francis Scott Key Bridge near the Port of Baltimore set other eastern ports scrambling to take on diverted shipments.

The International Longshoremen’s Association has been indicating for months that its members were prepared to strike. The union is seeking significant wage increases as part of its negotiations with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX), the association of port employers. The alliance published a statement on Monday saying it had made an offer to “increase wages by nearly 50 percent, triple employer contributions to employee retirement plans, [and] strengthen our health care options.”
DSC_0073.JPG
Aaron Wilson, who has worked at the Philadelphia port for 20 years.
Jared Brey
The ILA, however, called the group’s offer “an unacceptable wage package that we reject.” The dispute has also revolved around issues of automation technology. The union suspended negotiations with USMX earlier this summer after it said it had found automated gate systems in use at the Port of Mobile in violation of the terms of its contract. The gate has reportedly been in place for more than a decade-and-a-half. “There’s no point trying to negotiate a new agreement with USMX when one of its major companies continues to violate our current agreement with the sole aim of eliminating ILA jobs through automation,” ILA International President Harold Daggett said in June, according to reports.

On Tuesday, Daggett released a statement demanding “absolute airtight language that there will be no automation or semi-automation” at eastern and Gulf ports.

The dispute reflects longstanding concerns about the impacts of technology on labor as well as new concerns about how artificial intelligence could affect various workforces.

According to a report on port infrastructure from the Government Accountability Office (GAO), automation is somewhat more common at foreign ports than at U.S. ports. Labor rules are one of the reasons why, though other factors are important as well, including the types of shipments that ports handle. Also, it requires big infrastructure investments to automate port functions, says Andrew Von Ah, an infrastructure director at the GAO who authored the report on port automation. Port operators look to justify those investments with operational savings.

“The unions are looking for some guarantee that we’re not going to lose a lot of jobs here, which of course ruins whatever hope you had of a business case,” Von Ah says. “[Port operators] need to have a return or know that they can get a return, and often where that comes is a reduction in labor costs.”

California lawmakers considered a bill in 2019 that would have given state regulators oversight of automation technology at certain ports. The legislation didn’t become law.

More unions are grappling with issues of automation as technology evolves. Screenwriters and journalists, for example, have fought to protect creative jobs amid the proliferation of generative AI.

The USMX has so far offered to keep existing language about automation in its contract with longshoremen. But the issue is likely to become a larger part of labor disputes as technology evolves.

“Organized labor really has begun to think real seriously about what would be the right kinds of controls and parameters that could be placed around [artificial intelligence] technology,” says Robert Bruno, director of the Labor Education Program at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, “Understanding that its introduction, at some level, seems inevitable.”
Jared Brey is a senior staff writer for Governing. He can be found on Twitter at @jaredbrey.